Samye Monastery
![]()

Samye was the first
monastery to be built in Tibet. It was probably founded during the 770's under
the patronage of King Trisong Detsen, with the work being directed by
Padmasambhava and Shantarakshita, the two Indian masters that the king had
invited to Tibet. The monastery is designed on the plan of the Odantapuri temple
in India (present-day Bihar), and mirrors the structure of the universe
according to Buddhist cosmology. The central temple represents Mt. Sumeru, the
mythical mountain at the centre of the cosmos. Around it are four temples called
'ling', which represent the four continents (ling) situated in the vast ocean to
the north, south, east, and west of Sumeru. To the right and left of each of
these are smaller temples, called 'ling-tren', representing sub-continents. Four
great stupas, in four colours (white, red, blue and green)
stood
facing the (south-east, south-west, north-west, and north-east, respectively)
corners of the main temple, andare being reconstructed. Near the North (Jangchub
Semkye) ling, is a protector chapel, Pehar Kordzoling, adorned with unusual
mural work featuring skulls. One ling-tren, the Dragyur Gyagar Ling
(South-South-West) was established for the sole purpose of translating sutras.
Beyond its front entrance is an idyllic courtyard, planted with flowers, trees,
and bamboo.
When the monastery was first built, both Indian and Chinese monks were invited
there to work on the translation of Buddhist scriptures from their respective
languages into Tibetan. The Indians lived in the Aryapalo (Hayagriva) Ling
temple to the south, and the Chinese in the Jampa (Maitreya) Ling to the west.
Conflicts arose between the two factions concerning doctrinal interpretation,
and the king called for a public debateto settle the matter. This took place
around 792, between Kamalashila, adisciple of Shantarakshita, and Hoshang. The
debate, which took place in the Jampa Ling, was presided
over
by Trisong Detsen, and was intended to establish which form of Buddhism should
prevail in Tibet: the Indian monastic tradition of systematic study, firm
adherence to ethical rules, and a practice that entails the gradual ascendance
of stages leading to enlightenment; or the Chinese tradition of Ch'an (Zen),
which favours a direct ('sudden') breakthrough to the ultimate nature of
consciousness and existence, for which intellect and morality, the twin pillars
of the Indian school, are not necessary, and can even be hindrances. The
accounts of the outcome of the debate are ambiguous, both sides claiming
victory. The actual outcome, though, is beyond doubt: The Indian view was
favoured, and from then on the Chinese influence waned. Hoshang had to leave
Tibet, and the Ch'an tradition was effectively proscribed.